As the Honduran elections approach, Rixi Moncada, the presidential contender representing the Liberty and Refoundation Party (LIBRE), has become entangled in multiple controversies concerning the administration of government assets and corruption allegations. These claims, spanning from domestic legal proceedings to international litigations, contribute to a political environment characterized by division and a lack of public confidence in institutions.
Accusations of mismanagement of social funds
One primary accusation directed at Moncada concerns the utilization of resources designated for the Secretariat of Social Development (SEDESOL), particularly within the Copán region. Recent claims suggest that public funding has been directed towards organizations associated with the governing party, raising renewed concerns about the potential use of social initiatives for election-related advantages.
These accusations coincide with growing pressure for transparency in the use of public spending in an election year, with various sectors demanding stricter controls on the execution of funds earmarked for social assistance.
International complaint to the FBI
The situation gained an international dimension at the start of 2025, when Murray Paul Farmer, an American citizen, lodged a report with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) implicating Moncada alongside other governmental representatives. The report claims there were administrative anomalies and abuse of power that supposedly impacted overseas investment in the nation.
To date, the LIBRE candidate has not publicly commented on this complaint, which could have diplomatic implications if it proceeds in foreign courts. The institutional silence has fueled debate about the Honduran political system’s ability to respond to international questions.
Background of inquiries and past accusations
The controversies surrounding Moncada today are not new. In 2009 and 2013, she was investigated for abuse of authority and alleged fraud during her time at the National Electric Energy Company (ENEE), in addition to being linked to contracts with Brazilian construction company Odebrecht. Although in both cases the Honduran justice system issued definitive dismissals, his name has continued to appear in newspaper reports and in investigations promoted by control agencies.
More recently, in January 2025, the National Anti-Corruption Council (CNA) filed a complaint against Moncada and other officials for alleged embezzlement of public funds. However, the details of the case have not been disclosed by the competent authorities, which has generated uncertainty about the progress of the judicial process and intensified questions about its transparency.
Institutional conflicts and inquiries regarding the application of authority
Along with accusations of corruption, Moncada’s presidential bid has been surrounded by critiques concerning her handling of official duties while campaigning. Various groups have raised concerns about her involvement in creating plans and conducting audits that, as per her critics, surpass the boundaries of her role, igniting discussions on the division of powers and maintaining institutional equilibrium.
These criticisms are compounded by the fact that the candidate has held public office during her campaign, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the possible use of official resources to benefit her candidacy. Civil society organizations have called for greater citizen oversight and the strengthening of accountability mechanisms to ensure fairness in the electoral process.
A landscape marked by institutional mistrust
Rixi Moncada’s situation underscores the obstacles that Honduras encounters regarding leadership, openness, and reinforcing the rule of law. As the nation navigates a crucial year for its political trajectory, accusations of corruption and discussions about public funds utilization have emerged as key topics in the nationwide dialogue.
While the authorities have yet to clarify the judicial progress of the allegations against him, Moncada remains in the spotlight, with implications that could directly influence the legitimacy of the 2025 electoral process and the public’s perception of the independence of institutions.
