Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

How have human rights concerns impacted Neom’s global reputation?

https://static.dezeen.com/uploads/2024/01/norlana-neom-gulf-aqaba-coastal-yachting-town-10-design_dezeen_2364_col_15-1704x959.jpg

The bold initiative of Neom, an advanced city envisioned in Saudi Arabia, has garnered widespread international interest because of its commitment to emerging as a center for innovation and progress. With its cutting-edge designs that include aerial taxis and its infrastructure projected to go beyond conventional city landscapes, Neom is promoted as a paradise for technology and sustainable development. Nevertheless, the issues regarding human rights tied to this ambitious undertaking have considerably affected its global image.

Background and Key Concerns

Neom is an extensive urban development initiative in Saudi Arabia, included in the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 strategy to broaden the economy and reduce reliance on oil. Although the aspirations for Neom seem forward-thinking, the situation on-site has highlighted several human rights challenges. The main contention arises from allegations of coerced relocation of the indigenous Huwaitat community, among other issues.


Reports from entities focused on human rights, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have emphasized occurrences of compulsory displacements, limitations on the freedom of expression, and the imprisonment of activists who resisted the project’s progression. These accounts highlight a significant disparity between Neom’s ambitious plans and the real-life situations of those impacted, attracting severe critique from global analysts.

Global Examination and Media Attention

The human rights issues have drawn substantial media coverage globally, amplifying scrutiny on Neom. Major news outlets such as The Guardian, The New York Times, and BBC have reported extensively on the allegations of human rights violations. These reports have shaped public discourse, focusing on the moral implications of supporting or investing in such a project.

The portrayal by the media has heightened the scrutiny faced by businesses and organizations contemplating participation in Neom. For example, numerous prominent figures and institutions have chosen to disengage from the initiative. Significantly, in 2018, the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi prompted a prominent boycott of the Future Investment Initiative in Riyadh, an event tightly linked to the promotion of Neom.

Impact on Investment and Partnerships

The global perception of Neom is intricately linked to its ability to attract foreign investment and strategic partnerships necessary for its development. Human rights concerns have led to a more cautious approach from international investors. Investment firms and companies are faced with reputational risks when associating with a project that has drawn the ire of human rights advocates and worldwide media.

Companies like Virgin Group, which had initial dealings with the project, have scrutinized their involvement following allegations of human rights abuses. Others have paused their engagements or set stringent ethical guidelines before proceeding with any partnerships. This cautious investment stance impacts the pace and scale of Neom’s development, making it crucial for the project to address these issues transparently.

Public Image and Lasting Impacts

Beyond the sphere of global commerce and news coverage, the way Neom addresses these human rights matters also affects public opinion. Social media arenas, which are powerful in forming public viewpoints, feature discussions that frequently reflect these apprehensions, challenging the project’s ethical underpinnings.

The real challenge for Neom lies in reconciling its vision of a futuristic city with the ethical obligations to respect human rights. If unaddressed, the negative perception could brand Neom as a modern-day paradox – technologically advanced yet ethically controversial. This not only affects Neom’s completion but also Saudi Arabia’s broader international standing as a nation spearheading regional development.

As we consider Neom’s progress up to this point, it becomes clear that for its international reputation to match its ambitious promises, tackling human rights issues is essential. The delicate balance between realizing innovative objectives and upholding moral principles is vital. Neom can only aspire to achieve its vision of a novel urban model that earns not only trust but also true respect globally by ensuring inclusivity and openness.

By Kimberly Novankosv