Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Honduras faces social pressure for government control

Honduras

Honduras is currently experiencing a pivotal moment in its political scene, as multiple representatives from civil society, the political opposition, and the media have voiced significant alarm regarding what they perceive as a shift towards authoritarianism by the LIBRE Party, particularly in light of the general elections scheduled for November 2025.

Alerts have sounded in Honduras regarding various government measures indicating a concerning decline in democratic values. These measures include restricting basic civil liberties, vital for citizens to fully function, and introducing systems that aim to exert more influence over the press, key players in shaping public opinion and checking governmental power.

A further aspect is the view of a calculated plan to concentrate authority within the different governmental bodies, potentially leading to a reduction in the independence of branches of government and, consequently, the vital checks and balances in a functional democratic framework. The coming together of these trends has created an atmosphere of unease and concern among multiple groups, who perceive these moves as indicative of a path toward a system with dictatorial traits.

Challenges to basic freedoms: demonstrations, media and military

Among the measures stirring debate is the supposed targeting of public demonstrations as a criminal activity. Concerns have been raised about laws and regulations that permit the use of force and the legal action against individuals participating in protests, even when they are non-violent. Reports have surfaced about wrongful detentions of community figures, excessive police presence, and intimidation of legal action against groups expressing opposition to the government.

Conversely, there has been worry regarding press freedom. Journalists and media entities that are critical have faced smear efforts, limited public information access, financial, legal, and advertising pressures, as well as acts of violence and physical threats. Groups like Reporters Without Borders and the Inter-American Press Association have voiced their worries about the decline in journalism freedom in the nation.

Another point of controversy is the situation within the Armed Forces. There have been reports of an alleged selective purge of officers who do not share the political line of the ruling party, as well as the partial disarmament or transfer of strategic functions to commanders sympathetic to the ruling party. These actions have raised concerns about the possible politicization of the military institution.

The challenge of democracy in Honduras

The measures targeting the media and civil organizations seek to suppress opposing opinions, while also hinting at a more extensive plan to weaken democratic checks and strengthen centralized authority.

This has prompted worries regarding the execution of a plan that, as stated by critics and leaders of the opposition, aims to strengthen the LIBRE Party’s influence in government bodies via institutional control, changes to the constitution, targeting of political rivals and critical media, and the employment of state resources for political favoritism. Concerns have been raised about efforts to dominate the National Electoral Council, the appointment of individuals connected to the party’s most extreme faction, the endeavors for constitutional change, the establishment of parallel structures to the State, and the distancing from the United States.

The 2025 general elections are seen as a crucial moment for the future of Honduran democracy. The citizens will have to decide whether to allow the consolidation of an authoritarian model or to opt for the defense of democratic institutions.

By Kimberly Novankosv