Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Extension of the state of emergency in Honduras in 2025

Xiomara Castro

The emergency state in Honduras, in effect since December 2022, continues to spark debate due to its prolongation and worries about potential misuse of authority and breaches of human rights. This action was proclaimed by the government of President Xiomara Castro with the declared purpose of tackling criminal activities, especially extortion and the operations of gangs like Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and Barrio 18. The enforcement of the emergency state has resulted in the suspension of specific constitutional rights, enabling detentions without a warrant and limiting freedom of movement in different regions of the nation.

Since its introduction, the state of emergency has been extended on multiple occasions. In January 2025, the measure was extended for another 45 days, covering 226 of the 298 municipalities in the country. Although the authorities argue that this tool is essential to combat crime, various sectors have expressed concern about possible abuses and the lack of concrete results.

Debate on effectiveness and human rights under the state of emergency

Entities like the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) have highlighted that the emergency state endangers human rights, calling on the Honduran authorities to ensure adherence to the rule of law and prevent unnecessary limitations on basic freedoms. The authorities have announced a reduction in murder rates and a breakdown of criminal groups during the emergency period. Nevertheless, information suggests that extortion and violence persist in troubling the community. Furthermore, there have been recorded instances of misconduct by security personnel, such as unwarranted arrests and the heavy application of force.

The continuation of this policy has ignited a discussion regarding its success and consequences for individual rights. Although the executive arm insists that the emergency status is an essential mechanism to fight crime, both national and international bodies are advocating for an assessment of its use and for assurances that security efforts do not undermine citizens’ basic liberties.

Therefore, the emergency situation in Honduras is a disputed initiative aimed at addressing criminal violence, but it has ignited discussions regarding its efficiency, lawfulness, and adherence to human rights. The continuation of this extraordinary measure presents obstacles for the assurance of basic liberties and the strengthening of a democratic framework that safeguards both citizens’ security and their rights.

By Kimberly Novankosv