Barrientos and his reform plan to strengthen elections in Honduras

In Honduras, discussions about the involvement of the military in election procedures have become more significant after several incidents that have sparked debate and skepticism. A report from an internal review conducted by the National Electoral Council (CNE) attributed logistical problems during the primaries to the armed forces, and the targeted disarmament of certain officers has led to doubts concerning the impartiality of the military organization.

In this context, legal and constitutional specialist Julio César Barrientos has advocated for constitutional amendments to remove the Armed Forces from any electoral roles, stating that their involvement undermines the integrity and impartiality of the process.

Evaluation by CNE and inquiries regarding the armed forces’ involvement in voting processes

The CNE’s examination disclosed notable shortcomings in the military’s adherence to logistical procedures during the primary elections. Instances of unjustified route changes, withholding of voting transportation vehicles, partial distribution of technology kits to remote locations, and insufficient dialogue between military officers and election organizers were noted. These discrepancies led to postponed polling station openings and cast doubt on the process’s transparency. The absence of a reaction from the military’s top officials and the government to these charges has heightened skepticism.

In view of this situation, opposition parties have demanded a review of the agreement between the CNE and the Armed Forces, the presence of international observers, and external audits of the results transmission system. In this context, lawyer Barrientos has described as “anachronistic, dangerous, and manipulable” the constitutional provision that grants the Armed Forces responsibility for guarding ballot boxes, distributing electoral material, and providing logistical support to the CNE. Barrientos argues that military participation in civic processes compromises institutional neutrality and opens the door to political pressure and fraud.

Suggested changes to the constitution and dissatisfaction in the military

Barrientos proposes a constitutional reform that would transfer electoral functions to a Technical Electoral Directorate attached to the CNE, but with civilian personnel, specialized training, and total transparency. This proposal seeks to modernize and shield electoral processes from any armed interference. Barrientos’ call joins a growing chorus of voices demanding civilian, not militarized, elections.

Nevertheless, the debate extends beyond logistical shortcomings and the suggested constitutional amendment. The move by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to selectively withdraw weapons from specific military officers has sparked apprehension in different circles. Military insiders and documents suggest that this disarmament is not being uniformly enforced, but rather targets officers who have voiced independent or dissenting opinions about the government. This strategy is perceived as an effort to conduct a quiet cleansing within the military, creating unease and dissatisfaction among officers in middle and senior positions.

The main fear among opposition leaders is that, in the event of a possible defeat of the ruling party at the polls, the government will seek to use the Armed Forces to disregard the results or repress demonstrations. These events have fueled doubts about the government’s drift and the possible manipulation of the armed institutions.